requestId:68518650b57974.18467643.
Additional Discussion, Physical Discussion and Mou Zongsan’s Re-reflection on the Department of Science
Author: Chen Rongzhuo, Yang Ru, He Xiaozhuo, Xu Xisan
Source: “Shangqiu Teachers’ Fashion College News” Issue 1, 2023
Conversation: In April 2022, the Taiwan Zhongshan Dali Academy held a “Gasual Discussion and Chinese Philosophy” academic seminar. The main reason for this activity is to examine Mou Zongsan’s limitations on Chinese philosophy through “game theory”, especially focusing on Mou Zongsan’s controversy over the judgment of the Song and Ming Technological Department because he underestimated the atmosphere and was low on the Internet. I invited two-level students of the current level of weight, Yang Rubin and Chen Rongzhuo, who have a very specific impact on the science of gas philosophy, to conduct a profound conversation on the opposite side. Both teachers and teachers are well-known for their works, and have raised creative ideas for Mou Zongsan’s gastronomy restrictions for a long time and challenged and discussed the transition. However, the two teachers have similar subtle differences in their atmosphere, which remains to be identified. Others also invited German scholar Hebuel Fabian and I to respond to the two teachers, and interspersed dialogues in an appraisal manner. I hope to make the discussion, physical theory and Mou Zongsan’s debate on the scientific construction system, and through the emphasis on exploring and rethinking of the thinking method of gambler, thinking and making it a more civic philosophical topic in Chinese philosophy.
San Zhi of Xi from Kaohsiung Xi, Taiwan Zhongshan University of Literature
Conversationist: Chen Rongzhuo (Trade of Bruk)
Yang Rubin (Trade of the Department of Philosophy in Qinghua, Taiwan)
Respondent: Xu Xi (Specially Assistant Professor of the Chinese Department of Zhongshan University of Taiwan, Dean of the School of Literature)
He Xiaopeng (“China Research Institute” Authored by the Chinese Literature and Philosophy Research Institute)
The person in charge: Zhu Zhichang (produced by the Department of Chinese Studies in Zhongshan, Taiwan)
The person in Chinese written by word: Su Hongzhang (school of the Department of Chinese Studies in Zhongshan, Taiwan)
The person in charge of Chinese Studies in Zhongshan, Taiwan)
The person in charge of Chinese Studies in Zhongshan, Taiwan)
The person in charge of Chinese Studies in Zhongshan, Zhejiang)
The person in charge of Chinese Studies in Zhichang: Teachers, classmates, valuables, good friends, good friends, master Wu’an! The Literature Academy’s “Thinking the Clouds in Zhongshan—The Cross-Civilization Lecture Hall” will bring the topic of “game theory and Chinese Philosophy” to everyone. We are very glad tomorrow and we will be lucky to ask a few top-notch experts to study! From my far left, Chen Rongzhuo is a honorary professor in the Department of Philosophy in Big Brock, Canada, and we welcome him! Here comes teacher Yang Rubin, a lecturer in the Department of Philosophy in Qinghua. We welcome him! On my right hand, He Weiwei, a researcher at the Institute of Literature and Philosophy, the “Central Research Institute”, is welcome to him! Next is the Third Dean of Xi, who will lead us to discuss tomorrow’s topics.
The sky in Xizi Bay can be said to be very good tomorrow, and the aura of these students is very outstanding. Because they are all famous artists, I am actually very nervous as the manager tomorrow. But I love the learning opportunity this time, especially Teacher Chen and Teacher Yang, who have been very top-notch writers in the study of gas and the study of Chinese thinking history for 20 or 30 years. Let me take a look at what the teacher said: In Taiwan, and even the whole world, the two of them are the top research topics in this field. Teacher Xu also has a lot of words to say tomorrow, so I asked me to take charge of it.
When it comes to the history of long-term cultivation gas research, it can be said to be a long-term source. In fact, we are very grateful that Teacher Yang must have written a series of works such as “Aura and Body View in Modern Thoughts in China” and “Analysis of Confucian Gastronomy and Kung Fu” [1], which opened up the topic of qi studies in the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and the three regions, and even globally. This topic has always been cured and fermented to tomorrow, and the discussion can be very impressive. The master saw that these few Han scholars who were short and very top tomorrow were also several Han scholars who were very important to rebuild the modernity of Chinese philosophical philosophical in the third period of the post-Mou Zong. Tomorrow, my good friends come to our lecture hall, which can be said to be on the cusp of academics.
Gas for Chinese thinking has been a long-standing source in the history of Chinese thinking. I found that yesterday’s question and tomorrow’s question are mutually reciprocal. Yesterday, He Xiaobiao’s pendant gave us a good head. The “Xuanpin” is indeed related to “gas”. I used what He Zhuan taught. He said: Martin Heidegger brought the valley into the cave, so that the shadow of the cave no longer stood negative, and thus entered Heidegger’s “true concealment and obscurity”. What does this have to do with “gas”? If we look at the oracle bone inscriptions, the word “gas” () in oracle bone inscriptions actually means that rivers are overturned, and rivers are overturned by three lines, that is, that gas, which is equivalent to saying that this water evaporates. Evaporation becomes a fluid, which can be said to be water, cloud, and natural gas. The gas originates from rivers and valleys, and has the characteristics of transformation and smoothness, and is transformed into yin and yang. This seems to be able to contrast Heidegger’s “both visible” and relationship with Yin and Yin.
In the history of thinking, the Chinese thinker realized that “gas” can be used as a thinking resource to solve some problems. Yesterday, another other fuzi was Teacher Yang Rubin, who mentioned “deep consciousness”, “mystery” and “real state and form”. From the articles offered tomorrow, we can clearly see that we will focus on the “third department” of science. What is the so-called “deep consciousness” and “mystery” in the subtle and hidden secrets of the realm of nature and nature, and what is the relationship between the discussion of gas, the Taoist discussion of gas and the discussion of gas mentioned in the third department of science? I’m waiting for you to hear Teacher Yang make a comment tomorrow.
Social ScienceFor the third department, I have read the articles taught by Professor Chen and Yang. Among them, I will supplement and modify the third department of Teacher Mou Zongsan, and the key to this supplement and modify is to verify the academic knowledge. So, I think this “gaze” involves body view, kung fuinclusive discussion, cultivation, natural view, cosmic theory, and even social politics theory, and even the theory of civilized development. In the frame formed by some theories, the thinking and thinking seem to travel through it and become a good thing that thinkers can fully use to explain their theoretical system. So to use Teacher Yang’s words, checking the spirit, through the spirit of verification, it seems that you can become a good standard for you to judge the Three Deeds or perhaps the East and West. I rarely see such a meeting, and there are data coming up in advance. Why do I feel so shocked because as students, sometimes the rate of reading books is not as fast as that of a teacher. Sometimes it doesn’t even digest well, so tomorrow I ask them to show off their own teachings. This is the best way to accept their learning questions [2].
There are two entries on the foundation of tomorrow’s first session: Chen Rongzhuo and Yang Ru and the teaching of Yang Ru, each person needs to give a 30-minute speech, and then ask He Zhuo to respond to Dean Zhuo. This is the first session. After the second session, they responded to the previous session and discussed in a comprehensive manner. I think there are many friends who are very concerned about this topic tomorrow. Tomorrow is a very difficult opportunity. I can feel that the dean is very concerned about this discussion because he said that the length of the discussion is often forward-looking and can be said to be the forefront of academics. So, I want to wait a moment and we can say that I personally think that He taught the speed of speech is the one I can most accept, and his thinking and sensibility are very good. There will be records for tomorrow’s lectures, and the Dean of the People’s Republic of China has a waiting time: the discussions that yearn for tomorrow can become historical literature.
My words came here, and the time was very tight, so we handed over the next time to Teacher Chen and Teacher Yang.
Teacher Chen Rongzhuo: Let me tell you first, because I am a response to him.
Yang Rubin taught: No, I respond to you, because the atmosphere always responds.
Thank you for your introduction! First of all, I am very grateful to Zhongshan University for hosting such a meeting, whi
發佈留言